CandRHolder

Seaman
  • Content count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About CandRHolder

  • Rank
    Basic Training

Personal Information

  • City and State Arizona

Recent Profile Visitors

158 profile views
  1. Merry Christmas to ya'll

    Merry Christmas R.L. and to all who are serving or who have served to protect the U.S.A. and our Rights, R.L. I was injured while serving overseas after being caught in the Post 9/11 rush. I'm living everyday with residual physical issues and can relate to you and all those who wake up n the morning (as one side of your mind says M@#$%er F)(*&er and the other realizes that there are a lot more people who have it worse. I have small goal is to purchase an M16 and then a Norrell Trigger Group. It might take me a while, as I'm still paying alimony to the Ex who bailed on be while I was hurt, but life is a lot better today. I also want to thank all the members her who continually share their experience of NFA items and C&R items. I've been a long time lurker and have learned a lot. Godspeed to All CRH
  2. Bump stock ban

    Everyone who care about saving their NFA legacy for future generations should pitch in a few dollars.
  3. Bump stock ban

    Now is the time. Now we know the codified language and how to legal fight it. Regardless of your thoughts god/bad about bump stocks we need to UNITE to fight the BACK DOOR TO LAW MAKING. Here's the legalese of arguing against the ban. IMHO its a rock-soild argument as we all know the a bump stock comes no where near fitting the codified Legal Definition of a Machine Gun. IF WE DON'T FIGHT THIS IT SETS A DANGEROUS PRECENT TO BAN JUST ABOUT ANY OTHER FIREARM OR FIREARM ACCESSORY. Not: I am not connected to this firm and only have seen their work published on their blogs https://blog.princelaw.com/2018/12/18/ficg-files-complaint-and-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-challenging-atfs-final-rule-on-bumpstocks/ As a result, Damien Guedes backed by institutional plaintiffs Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Firearms Policy Foundation, and the Madison Society Foundation, Inc., represented by attorneys Joshua Prince and Adam Kraut of Firearms Industry Consulting Group, filed suit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Acting ATF Director Thomas E. Brandon, purported Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and the United States of America seeking a preliminary injunction. Among other things, the suit alleges that Matthew Whitaker lacks the authority to implement a final rule, challenges the ATF’s violations of the Administrative Procedures Act, and argues that ATF usurped its authority by rewriting the definition to a term that Congress had clearly defined. For an overview of the lawsuit, see BuzzFeed’s comprehensive article – Gun Rights Activists Are Already Suing Over Trump’s Bump Stock Ban. Individuals wishing to donate to the legal challenge may do so by contributing to the fund. If your rights have been violated by a federal administrative agency during a rulemaking proceeding or you want to file a comment in support or opposition to a notice of proposed rulemaking, contact Firearms Industry Consulting Group today to discuss YOUR rights and legal options. Firearms Industry Consulting Group® (FICG®) is a registered trademark and division of Civil Rights Defense Firm, P.C., with rights and permissions granted to Prince Law Offices, P.C. to use in this article.
  4. Bump stock ban

    Answer: After the Ban is Codified. Its a known fact that Anti-2A Groups monitor boards like this. This board has probable the most collective experience of NFA use, application and processes than any other. Posting Opinions or Legal Positions regarding what is possibly deficient in any pending Anti-2A Ban/Action, (including ways to defeat it), MIGHT cause a pending Ban to be shored up and modified before the finial filing. Btw, IT IS A HUGH ISSUE, Banning BStocks today will open the door to banning similar firearms related items in the future. I do NOT support ANY proposed Ban, (especially when the Technologies Branch already formally decided the device WAS NOT A MG AND WAS LEGAL).
  5. Bump stock ban

    Lets all refrain from commenting as; 1) Any pending changes HAVE NOT SOLIDIFIED AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND: 2) Anti-2A groups monitor the boards for our Poker Hands. We don't want them to close any potential deficiencies they might have. They'll be a time and a place to voice our opinions. Now is not the time.
  6. HK94 Unconverted on Form 1

    Agreed with Piney, I've UPS'd NFA MG's across state lines with a Repair Workorder and Copy of Form 4 with the Gunsmith's info in the TO: line. (Just make sure to buy enough insurance) Here the scoop right from the Cow's mouth (IT IS SUGGESTED BY ATF, NOT MANDATED TO HAVE AN APPROVED Form 5); https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-licensed-gunsmith-receive-nfa-firearm-purposes-repair May a licensed gunsmith receive an NFA firearm for purposes of repair? Yes, a licensed gunsmith may receive a National Firearms Act firearm for the sole purpose of repair and subsequent return to its owner. It is suggested that the owner obtain permission from ATF for the transfer by submitting an ATF Form 5, Application for Tax Exempt Transfer and Registration of Firearm, to the NFA Branch and receive approval prior to the delivery. The gunsmith should do the same prior to returning the firearm. Last Reviewed September 11, 2015 If you need to hear it for yourself just call the receiving NFA Gunsmith as he's done this before and has to put your gun on his books(His FFL). Good Luck C
  7. I agree with the above comments and with Mr Todd. Why isn't the investment aspect of gun collecting mentioned anywhere? The other asinine thing is that 3 Contiguous bordering States are still Free and allow legal gun collecting.
  8. Is the MG one of Norrells registered Trigger Packs? Thanks